You can read a wikipedia review.
Unfortunately, I did not feel wikipedia review is justified by stating the book is a critique and revision of Rawl's ideas. Rawl's has been used more like a central theme to which other concepts are compared with to make the complex theory understandable. However, just a few word of caution on when you start reading the book. This is not your one other coffee table books. Very detailed and thought provoking in style and content. Needs extreme patience and concentration to really make sense of the book. Definitely, gives a thorough understanding of justice, reasoning and principles behind them.
If you have serious appreciation for the concepts of justice and reasoning no book can be better to get a wide perspective.
Views expressed here are author's personal views and do not reflect the views of author's current or any previous employer.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Chamber - John Grisham (1994)
A good family story but not the best of John Grisham. I like John Grisham because of the depth in which he covers legal matters in his nove...
-
Just unputdownable. In search for the eternal question Who am I , the Swamiji renounces all the materialistic pleasures and careers and com...
-
This critical appreciation is submitted as a project assignment for a course I have registered for. Introduction The play by Vijay Tendulkar...
-
In lines of The Survival of the Fittest which was coined by Herbert Spencer in 1864 as a sequel to Darwin's theory of natural selection,...
No comments:
Post a Comment