You can read a wikipedia review.
Unfortunately, I did not feel wikipedia review is justified by stating the book is a critique and revision of Rawl's ideas. Rawl's has been used more like a central theme to which other concepts are compared with to make the complex theory understandable. However, just a few word of caution on when you start reading the book. This is not your one other coffee table books. Very detailed and thought provoking in style and content. Needs extreme patience and concentration to really make sense of the book. Definitely, gives a thorough understanding of justice, reasoning and principles behind them.
If you have serious appreciation for the concepts of justice and reasoning no book can be better to get a wide perspective.
Views expressed here are author's personal views and do not reflect the views of author's current or any previous employer.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Revolt in Tibet — Frank Moraes (1959)
While going over some books on my bookshelf, I came across this one. A book written in 1959—who needs it now? It was my father’s book when h...
-
A very simple yet very effective framework to bring in innovation in any marketing set up. The basic concepts is fairly simple choose one of...
-
In lines of The Survival of the Fittest which was coined by Herbert Spencer in 1864 as a sequel to Darwin's theory of natural selection,...
-
Yuganta is a unique depiction of the Mahabharata the grand epic of the Hindu religion. The book tries to rationalize the epic and present it...
No comments:
Post a Comment