I will refrain from writing a review on this book as this book is small stuff as well :-). Well the point is not that. Very nice book and will suggest if anyone is interested in knowing about life it has good potential of introducing life skills. Surprisingly, the moral is very similar to the Karma yogi philosophy "Karmanyebaadhikaraste Ma phalessu Kadacha na" and nothing more. Once, one learns to be a karma yogi the book is just too obvious.
But in any case, I will add my own view points on the subject. I think over a period of time as we become more and more competitive in the society we have tried to evaluate everything. Things we like or may not like. We want to evaluate it against a set of metric and dissect everything to small stuff which we can extract. That person is like that. This person is nice. I think we have started comparing every feeling we encounter to the best feelings we ever encountered in life. In fact, no one is away from this neither the author nor the summary writer. We have to learn one life skill to accept things as they are. Accepting does not mean killing to fire to change. But, not to complain about it. One more point I feel is important is not to be non-competitive. I guess the less we know the more we try to compete.
If you have read chanakya niti sometime in your life you might have heard "Namrati Phalanti Briksha, Namrate Gunina Janaah" - You will find a fruit bearing tree bowing down, wise men are egoless as well. However, we do not see that in real life with the wise men we know of. One reason could be, in society we have created the system we have a competitive means of identifying the wise. Eliminating the competition is important. Bringing in competition with self will probably eliminate some of that. Am I a more learned man than I was yesterday? Am I a better person than I was yesterday? are probably some questions we should ask.
Finally on the book: Must read. But will be hard to digest if you still are battling with the small things. I could not accept all the points in the book. I feel they are because I am not yet out of those illogical needs in my life and not that the book is wrong.
Views expressed here are author's personal views and do not reflect the views of author's current or any previous employer.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Chamber - John Grisham (1994)
A good family story but not the best of John Grisham. I like John Grisham because of the depth in which he covers legal matters in his nove...
-
This critical appreciation is submitted as a project assignment for a course I have registered for. Introduction The play by Vijay Tendulkar...
-
Just unputdownable. In search for the eternal question Who am I , the Swamiji renounces all the materialistic pleasures and careers and com...
-
In lines of The Survival of the Fittest which was coined by Herbert Spencer in 1864 as a sequel to Darwin's theory of natural selection,...
2 comments:
I wish to know what are those points which you could not digest and accept. So far I think the book has been one of the best books anyone could ever had read. I don't think it has implied any non acceptable tones anywhere in the book!
If you are accepting every bit of facts in a self help or a book on philosophy then you are either not internalizing it or aligned completely to the viewpoints presents. The second is probably not true. As I mentioned my points of disagreement are personal and does not make the book any less readable.
Post a Comment