While going over some books on my bookshelf, I came across this one. A book written in 1959—who needs it now? It was my father’s book when he was a teenager. When I decided to pick it up for some in-flight reading, my mother quipped that if people saw me, they would laugh. Who reads such old books? The Dalai Lama is now 90 years old. China is an accepted superpower. Maybe in a few years, the world will fully normalize Tibetan affairs and accept Chinese sovereignty over the region, relegating this book to purely archival value.
Before that happens, I wanted to do some justice to it—to understand what actually happened.
Moraes depicts the Tibetan story with complete dispassion. He breaks down the Chinese angle, the viewpoints of the Lamas, and the temporary British arrangement of granting suzerainty of the region to China. Historically, Tibet was a militarily weaker state that remained a vassal to Nepal and China at different times; even the Dalai Lama had fled Tibet several times in the past.
The review of Chinese tactics is particularly sharp. The Chinese communists systematically used the Panchen and Dalai Lama positions against each other to seize control of the region. They also exploited class differences among the Lamas to argue that the existing system violated communist principles of a classless society. Throughout the narrative, you see geopolitics being deftly weaponized by China to justify their actions wherever it suited them.
India’s role, by contrast, comes across as deeply contradictory. Nehru accepted Chinese suzerainty over Tibet as established by the British, yet he refused to maintain the tactical arrangements—like intelligence gathering and military balances—that the British had kept in the region. He operating under the belief that a peaceful relationship with China would prevent them from ever becoming hostile. Fascinatingly, Nehru also believed that granting asylum to the Dalai Lama would help the Indian public witness the downsides of communism firsthand, thereby thwarting its progress within India.
Because the book ends right after the Dalai Lama’s exile and before the 1962 Indo-China war, parts of it feel speculative. Whether Tibet was the primary catalyst for China's attack on India remains hard to decipher here, but the book accurately predicted that Tibet existing as an independent territory would become a thing of the past. Today, 65 years later, that prediction holds.
The book concludes with a short interview between Moraes and the Dalai Lama. It captures a striking historical moment: it shows the boyish confusion of a young man who has just lost his homeland, rather than the serious, polished statesman we see defending the rights of his nation today.
Definitely a book recommended for its historical significance and its window into a pivotal moment in Asian geopolitics.